Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a skin condition that may cause a rash and itching due to
inflammation of the skin. Therapies spread over the skin may not be enough to control the AD
in trial participants who require systemic anti-inflammatory treatment. This study compares
upadacitinib to dupilumab in adolescent and adult participants with moderate to severe AD who
have inadequate response to systemic therapies. Adverse events and change in the disease
activity will be assessed.
Upadacitinib and dupilumab are approved drugs for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic
dermatitis (AD). The study is comprised of a 35-day Screening Period, a 16-week treatment
period 1 and a 16-week treatment period 2. During period 1, participants are randomly
assigned in 1 of 2 groups, called treatment arms to receive upadacitinib Dose A or dupilumab.
In Period 2, participants will receive upadacitinib Dose A or Dose B. Approximately 880
adolescent and adult participants ages 12 to 64 with moderate to severe AD who are candidates
for systemic therapy will be enrolled at up to 330 sites worldwide.
Participants will receive upadacitinib oral tablets once daily or dupilumab as per its label
for 32 weeks and followed for 30 days.
There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their
standard of care . Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or
clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests,
checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.

A Study to Evaluate Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity Comparing Oral Upadacitinib to Subcutaneous Dupilumab in Adolescent and Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Quincy

Beacon Clinical Research, LLC /ID# 251412

Upadacitinib

Dupilumab

A Phase 3b/4 Randomized, Open-label, Efficacy Assessor Blinded Study, Comparing the Safety and Assessor Blinded Efficacy of Upadacitinib to Dupilumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (Level-Up)

Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS) is a chronic and debilitating urological
complex of disorders characterized by symptoms of bladder pain or discomfort, mostly upon
bladder filling, and often accompanied by lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). This study
will assess how safe and effective BOTOX (onabotulinumtoxinA) is in treating IC/BPS. Adverse
events and change in disease symptoms will be evaluated.
BOTOX (onabotulinumtoxinA) is an investigational drug being developed for the treatment of
Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS). Study doctors randomly assign the
participants to 1 of 2 groups, called treatment arms, to receive BOTOX or placebo. There is a
1 in 2 chance that participants will be assigned to placebo. Approximately 80 female
participants, aged 18 to 75 years, with a diagnosis of IC/BPS will be enrolled in
approximately 40 sites in the United States and Canada.
Participants will receive BOTOX or placebo injected into the bladder on Day 1 and will be
followed for at least 12 weeks in treatment 1. Eligible participants may request additional
dose of BOTOX between Weeks 12 and 24, and will be followed for 12 weeks in treatment period
2.
There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their
standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or
clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests,
checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.

Study of BOTOX Injections to Assess Change in Disease Activity and Adverse Events in Adult Female Participants With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS)

Watertown

Bay State Clincial Trials, Inc /ID# 240848

BOTOX

Placebo for BOTOX

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Arm Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Single Treatment of BOTOX, Followed by an Optional Open-Label Treatment With BOTOX, in Female Subjects With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS)

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of fremanezumab as
compared to placebo for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM).
Secondary objectives are to further demonstrate the efficacy of Fremanezumab as compared to
placebo for the preventive treatment of CM, to evaluate the safety and tolerability of
Fremanezumab in the preventive treatment of CM and to evaluate the immunogenicity of
Fremanezumab and the impact of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) on clinical outcomes in
participants exposed to Fremanezumab
The total duration of the study is planned to be 48 months.

A Study to Test if Fremanezumab is Effective in Preventing Chronic Migraine in Patients 6 to 17 Years of Age

Waltham

Teva Investigational Site 14246

Fremanezumab

Placebo

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Administration of Fremanezumab Versus Placebo for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine in Pediatric Patients 6 to 17 Years of Age

This phase II trial studies how well the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib works after
radiation therapy in children and young adults with high grade glioma who have a genetic
change called BRAF V600 mutation. Radiation therapy uses high energy rays to kill tumor cells
and reduce the size of tumors. Dabrafenib and trametinib may stop the growth of tumor cells
by blocking BRAF and MEK, respectively, which are enzymes that tumor cells need for their
growth. Giving dabrafenib with trametinib after radiation therapy may work better than
treatments used in the past in patients with newly-diagnosed BRAF V600-mutant high-grade
glioma.

Dabrafenib Combined With Trametinib After Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Newly-Diagnosed High-Grade Glioma

Boston

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Biospecimen Collection

Dabrafenib Mesylate

Lumbar Puncture

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Radiation Therapy

Trametinib Dimethyl Sulfoxide

A Phase 2 Study of Dabrafenib (NSC# 763760) With Trametinib (NSC# 763093) After Local Irradiation in Newly-Diagnosed BRAF V600-Mutant High-Grade Glioma (HGG)

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pitolisant
compared with placebo in treating excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients with
idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) age ≥18 years.
Key secondary objectives of this study are to assess the impact of pitolisant on:
-  Overall symptoms of IH
-  Patient impression of overall change in their symptoms of IH
-  Investigator assessment of overall disease severity of IH
Other secondary objectives of this study are to assess the impact of pitolisant in patients
with IH on:
-  Patient impression of overall severity of their EDS
-  Functional status and activities of daily living
-  Sleep-related impairment
-  Sleep inertia
-  Cognitive function

A Phase 3 Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Pitolisant in Adult Patients With Idiopathic Hypersomnia

Newton

Neurocare, INC

Pitolisant Oral Tablet

Placebo oral tablet

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Pitolisant in Adult Patients With Idiopathic Hypersomnia

This study will investigate the effect of tirzepatide on the reduction of morbidity and
mortality in adults living with obesity and provide additional evidence for the potential
clinical benefits of tirzepatide in this population.

A Study of Tirzepatide (LY3298176) on the Reduction on Morbidity and Mortality in Adults With Obesity

Methuen

ActivMed Practices and Research

Tirzepatide

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Effect of Tirzepatide on the Reduction of Morbidity and Mortality in Adults With Obesity

This is a randomized, pilot interventional study in participants with visual field deficit
(VFD) caused by cortical lesion. Damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) causes a
contra-lesional, homonymous loss of conscious vision termed hemianopsia, the loss of one half
of the visual field. The goal of this project is to elaborate and refine a rehabilitation
protocol for VFD participants. It is hypothesized that visual restoration training using
moving stimuli coupled with noninvasive current stimulation on the visual cortex will promote
and speed up recovery of visual abilities within the blind field in VFD participants.
Moreover, it is expected that visual recovery positively correlates with reduction of the
blind field, as measured with traditional visual perimetry: the Humphrey visual field test.
Finally, although results will vary among participants depending on the extension and
severity of the cortical lesion, it is expected that a bigger increase in neural response to
moving stimuli in the blind visual field in cortical motion area, for those participants who
will show the largest behavioral improvement after training. The overarching goals for the
study are as follows: Group 1 will test the basic effects of transcranial random noise
stimulation (tRNS) coupled with visual training in stroke cohorts, including (i) both chronic
and subacute VFD stroke participant, and (ii) longitudinal testing up to 6 months
post-treatment. Group 2 will examine the effects of tRNS alone, without visual training, also
including chronic and subacute VFD stroke participants and longitudinal testing.

Improving Visual Field Deficits With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS)

Computer Based Visual Training

Sham stimulation

Visual Restoration of Losses Caused by Cortical Damage: a New Protocol to Promote Fast Recovery

The purpose of this is study is to compare the efficacy of BHV-3500 (zavegepant) to placebo
as a preventive treatment for migraine, as measured by the reduction in the number of
migraine days per month.

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Zavegepant in Migraine Prevention

Medvadis Research Coroporation

BHV-3500 (zavegepant)

A Phase 2/3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Zavegepant in Migraine Prevention

This trial studies the side effects of radiation therapy followed by atezolizumab in treating
patients with stage II or III non-small cell lung cancer. Hyperfractionated radiation therapy
delivers smaller doses of radiation therapy over time and may kill more tumor cells and have
fewer side effects. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as atezolizumab, may help
the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells
to grow and spread. The purpose of this study is to test the safety and effectiveness of
radiation therapy followed by atezolizumab and find out what side effects, if any, it has on
patient's non-small cell lung cancer.

Study of Radiation Therapy Followed by Atezolizumab in Stage II or III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Winchester

Winchester Hospital

Atezolizumab

Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy

A Pilot Study of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Followed by Atezolizumab Consolidation in Stage II or III NSCLC Patients With Borderline Performance Status

This phase Ib trial studies the side effects of nivolumab and to see how well it works in
treating patients with autoimmune disorders and cancer that has spread to other places in the
body or cannot removed by surgery. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as
nivolumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the
ability of tumor cells to grow and spread.

Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Autoimmune Disorders and Advanced, Metastatic, or Unresectable Cancer

Nivolumab

A Phase Ib Study of Nivolumab in Patients With Autoimmune Disorders and Advanced Malignancies (AIM-NIVO)

Massachusetts