Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a skin condition that may cause a rash and itching due to
inflammation of the skin. Therapies spread over the skin may not be enough to control the AD
in trial participants who require systemic anti-inflammatory treatment. This study compares
upadacitinib to dupilumab in adolescent and adult participants with moderate to severe AD who
have inadequate response to systemic therapies. Adverse events and change in the disease
activity will be assessed.
Upadacitinib and dupilumab are approved drugs for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic
dermatitis (AD). The study is comprised of a 35-day Screening Period, a 16-week treatment
period 1 and a 16-week treatment period 2. During period 1, participants are randomly
assigned in 1 of 2 groups, called treatment arms to receive upadacitinib Dose A or dupilumab.
In Period 2, participants will receive upadacitinib Dose A or Dose B. Approximately 880
adolescent and adult participants ages 12 to 64 with moderate to severe AD who are candidates
for systemic therapy will be enrolled at up to 330 sites worldwide.
Participants will receive upadacitinib oral tablets once daily or dupilumab as per its label
for 32 weeks and followed for 30 days.
There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their
standard of care . Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or
clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests,
checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.

A Study to Evaluate Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity Comparing Oral Upadacitinib to Subcutaneous Dupilumab in Adolescent and Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Murray

University of Utah Mid Valley Dermatology /ID# 250042

Upadacitinib

Dupilumab

A Phase 3b/4 Randomized, Open-label, Efficacy Assessor Blinded Study, Comparing the Safety and Assessor Blinded Efficacy of Upadacitinib to Dupilumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (Level-Up)

This phase III trial investigates the best dose of vinblastine in combination with
selumetinib and the benefit of adding vinblastine to selumetinib compared to selumetinib
alone in treating children and young adults with low-grade glioma (a common type of brain
cancer) that has come back after prior treatment (recurrent) or does not respond to therapy
(progressive). Selumetinib is a drug that works by blocking a protein that lets tumor cells
grow without stopping. Vinblastine blocks cell growth by stopping cell division and may kill
cancer cells. Giving selumetinib in combination with vinblastine may work better than
selumetinib alone in treating recurrent or progressive low-grade glioma.

A Study to Compare Treatment With the Drug Selumetinib Alone Versus Selumetinib and Vinblastine in Patients With Recurrent or Progressive Low-Grade Glioma

Salt Lake City

Primary Children's Hospital

Biospecimen Collection

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Questionnaire Administration

Selumetinib Sulfate

Vinblastine Sulfate

A Phase 3 Study of Selumetinib (NSC# 748727) or Selumetinib in Combination With Vinblastine for Non-NF1, Non-TSC Patients With Recurrent or Progressive Low-Grade Gliomas (LGGs) Lacking BRAFV600E or IDH1 Mutations

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of fremanezumab as
compared to placebo for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM).
Secondary objectives are to further demonstrate the efficacy of Fremanezumab as compared to
placebo for the preventive treatment of CM, to evaluate the safety and tolerability of
Fremanezumab in the preventive treatment of CM and to evaluate the immunogenicity of
Fremanezumab and the impact of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) on clinical outcomes in
participants exposed to Fremanezumab
The total duration of the study is planned to be 48 months.

A Study to Test if Fremanezumab is Effective in Preventing Chronic Migraine in Patients 6 to 17 Years of Age

Teva Investigational Site 14375

Fremanezumab

Placebo

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Administration of Fremanezumab Versus Placebo for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine in Pediatric Patients 6 to 17 Years of Age

The primary objective of this study for the safety run-in cohorts of the study is to evaluate
the safety, tolerability, and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of magrolimab in combination
with nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel (Safety Run-In Cohort 1), and sacituzumab govitecan (Safety
Run-In Cohort 2) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).
The primary objective of this study for Phase 2 Cohort 1 is to compare the efficacy of
magrolimab in combination with nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel versus nab-paclitaxel or
paclitaxel alone, as determined by progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator
assessment.
The primary objective of this study for Phase 2 Cohort 2 is to evaluate the efficacy of
magrolimab in combination with sacituzumab govitecan as determined by confirmed objective
response rate (ORR) by investigator assessment.

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Magrolimab Combination Therapy in Adults With Unresectable, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah

Magrolimab

Nab-Paclitaxel

Paclitaxel

Sacituzumab govitecan

A Phase 2 Study of Magrolimab Combination Therapy in Patients With Unresectable, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

This study will look at how well the new medicine CagriSema helps people living with excess
body weight and type 2 diabetes losing weight. Participants will either get CagriSema or a
dummy medicine. Which treatment they get is decided by chance.
The study will last for about 1½ years. Women cannot take part if pregnant, breast-feeding or
plan to get pregnant during the study period.

A Research Study to See How Well CagriSema Helps People With Type 2 Diabetes and Excess Body Weight Lose Weight

St. George

Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

Cagrilintide

Semaglutide

Placebo cagrilintide

Placebo semaglutide

Efficacy and Safety of Cagrilintide s.c. 2.4 mg in Combination With Semaglutide s.c. 2.4 mg (CagriSema s.c. 2.4 mg/2.4 mg) Once-weekly in Participants With Overweight or Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes

This phase I/II trial tests the safety, side effects, and best dose of selinexor given in
combination with standard radiation therapy in treating children and young adults with newly
diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) or high-grade glioma (HGG) with a genetic
change called H3 K27M mutation. It also tests whether combination of selinexor and standard
radiation therapy works to shrink tumors in this patient population. Glioma is a type of
cancer that occurs in the brain or spine. Glioma is considered high risk (or high-grade) when
it is growing and spreading quickly. The term, risk, refers to the chance of the cancer
coming back after treatment. DIPG is a subtype of HGG that grows in the pons (a part of the
brainstem that controls functions like breathing, swallowing, speaking, and eye movements).
This trial has two parts. The only difference in treatment between the two parts is that some
subjects treated in Part 1 may receive a different dose of selinexor than the subjects
treated in Part 2. In Part 1 (also called the Dose-Finding Phase), investigators want to
determine the dose of selinexor that can be given without causing side effects that are too
severe. This dose is called the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). In Part 2 (also called the
Efficacy Phase), investigators want to find out how effective the MTD of selinexor is against
HGG or DIPG. Selinexor blocks a protein called CRM1, which may help keep cancer cells from
growing and may kill them. It is a type of small molecule inhibitor called selective
inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE). Radiation therapy uses high energy to kill tumor cells
and shrink tumors. The combination of selinexor and radiation therapy may be effective in
treating patients with newly-diagnosed DIPG and H3 K27M-Mutant HGG.

A Study of the Drug Selinexor With Radiation Therapy in Patients With Newly-Diagnosed Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine (DIPG) Glioma and High-Grade Glioma (HGG)

Biopsy

Radiation Therapy

Selinexor

A Phase 1/2 Trial of Selinexor (KPT-330) and Radiation Therapy in Newly-Diagnosed Pediatric Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG) and High-Grade Glioma (HGG)

The study consists of Safety Run-in and Phase 2 Cohorts.
The primary objectives of the safety run-in cohorts of this study are to evaluate the safety,
tolerability, and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of magrolimab in combination with
pembrolizumab + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) + platinum chemotherapy, and docetaxel in combination
with magrolimab in participants with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
Phase 2 Cohorts 1: To evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) with magrolimab in
combination with pembrolizumab + 5-FU + platinum versus pembrolizumab + 5-FU + platinum as
assessed by independent central review.
Phase 2 Cohorts 2 and 3: To evaluate the efficacy of magrolimab in combination with
pembrolizumab and magrolimab in combination with docetaxel as determined by the
investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR).

Study of Magrolimab Combination Therapy in Participants With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Huntsman Cancer Institute

Pembrolizumab

Docetaxel

5-FU

Cisplatin

Carboplatin

Zimberelimab

A Phase 2 Study of Magrolimab Combination Therapy in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The purpose of this is study is to compare the efficacy of BHV-3500 (zavegepant) to placebo
as a preventive treatment for migraine, as measured by the reduction in the number of
migraine days per month.

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Zavegepant in Migraine Prevention

Wasatch Clinical Research, LLC

BHV-3500 (zavegepant)

A Phase 2/3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Zavegepant in Migraine Prevention

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of obinutuzumab compared
with placebo in patients with International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society
(ISN/RPS) class III or IV lupus nephritis (LN) when added on to standard-of-care therapy
consisting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids.

A Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Obinutuzumab In Patients With ISN/RPS 2003 Class III Or IV Lupus Nephritis

University of Utah Health Science center; Department of Pediatrics for the University of Utah

Obinutuzumab

Prednisone

Methylprednisolone

Acetaminophen

Diphenhydramine

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Obinutuzumab In Patients With ISN/RPS 2003 Class III Or IV Lupus Nephritis (REGENCY)

This phase Ib trial studies the side effects of nivolumab and to see how well it works in
treating patients with autoimmune disorders and cancer that has spread to other places in the
body or cannot removed by surgery. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as
nivolumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the
ability of tumor cells to grow and spread.

Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Autoimmune Disorders and Advanced, Metastatic, or Unresectable Cancer

Huntsman Cancer Institute/University of Utah

Nivolumab

A Phase Ib Study of Nivolumab in Patients With Autoimmune Disorders and Advanced Malignancies (AIM-NIVO)

Utah